CO129-190 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [10-12] — Page 388

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

of the circumstances of the Bankruptcy which had passed out of my memory.

his statement that I was in any respect discourteous to him

I deny that on that occasion. Whilst he, Mr. Wotton in support of and Int Stephens representing our Gibbons was with me, QUAMONA as advocate for and... came into my room. Int. Gibbons remained and during the hearing of the summons Mr Gibbons gives an account of what occurred.... Bangs began... an inaccurate account that I insulted him at that time.

As to this he is expressly contradicted both by Br Walton and Int. Crossop, whose statements of what occurred are written as if given in evidence in the witness box. To their statements I emphatically add that I did not then insult him, but that his tone and manner and behaviour were irregular and insulting to me. Unless Mr. Gibbons is profoundly ignorant, he must have known that for him to speak, his advocate being present, was irregular.

2nd Mr. Gibbons complains that I did not accept his statement as to the character of the houses. My first remark is that nothing turned on the character of the houses with which he had connection. Moreover, it is a clear rule that...

...

'C.

Edit History

2026-05-22 02:27:54 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
of the circumstances of the Bankruptcy which had passed out of my memory. his statement that I was in any respect discourteous to him I deny that on that occasion. Whilst he, Mr. Wotton in support of and Int Stephens representing our Gibbons was with me, QUAMONA as advocate for and... came into my room. Int. Gibbons remained and during the hearing of the summons Mr Gibbons gives an account of what occurred.... Bangs began... an inaccurate account that I insulted him at that time. As to this he is expressly contradicted both by Br Walton and Int. Crossop, whose statements of what occurred are written as if given in evidence in the witness box. To their statements I emphatically add that I did not then insult him, but that his tone and manner and behaviour were irregular and insulting to me. Unless Mr. Gibbons is profoundly ignorant, he must have known that for him to speak, his advocate being present, was irregular. 2nd Mr. Gibbons complains that I did not accept his statement as to the character of the houses. My first remark is that nothing turned on the character of the houses with which he had connection. Moreover, it is a clear rule that... ... 'C.
Baseline (Original)
of the circumstances of the Bankruptory which had passed out of my memory. his statement that I was in any respect discourteous to him I dony that recasion. Whilst he Mr. Wotton in support of and Int Stephons representing our Gibbons Was the on with me QUAMONA as advocate for and... came into my room. Int. Gibbons remained and the dearing of the summons Mr Bibbons gives of what 1st He hearing occurred.... Bangs began... an inaccurate account that I insulted him at that As to this he is expressly contradicted both by br Walton and. Int. Irossop, whose statements of as what occurred are written as if given in evidence in the witmas 1 375 385 box. To their statements I emphatically add that I did not then insult him, but that his lone and manner and N were bearing irregular. insulting to me and~~ Antess Mr. Gibbons is profoundly ignorant he must have known that for + for him to speak, his advocate being present, was •irregular. 2nd Mr. Gibbons complains that I did not accept his statement as to the character of the houses. 心 My first remark is that nothing turned on the character of the houses with which he had connection. Moreover Moreover it is a No of personal clear rule that box 'C.
2026-05-22 02:27:54 · Baseline
View content

of the circumstances of the Bankruptory which had passed out of my memory.

his statement that I was in any respect discourteous to him

I dony

that recasion. Whilst he

Mr. Wotton in support of and Int Stephons representing our Gibbons

Was

the

on

with

me

QUAMONA

as advocate for and...

came into

my

room. Int. Gibbons remained and the

dearing of

the summons

Mr Bibbons gives

of

what

1st He

hearing

occurred....

Bangs

began...

an inaccurate account

that I insulted him at that

As to this he is expressly contradicted

both by br Walton and. Int. Irossop, whose

statements of

as

what

occurred are written

as if given in evidence in the witmas

1

375

385

box. To their statements I emphatically add that I did not then insult him,

but that his lone and manner and N

were

bearing irregular.

insulting

to me and~~

Antess Mr. Gibbons is profoundly

ignorant

he must have known that

for

+ for

him to speak, his advocate being present,

was

•irregular.

2nd Mr. Gibbons complains that I did

not

accept his statement as to the

character of the houses.

心

My first remark is that nothing

turned on

the character of the houses

with which he had

connection.

Moreover Moreover it is a

No

of

personal

clear rule that

box

'C.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.